Once upon a time in a place called Oaxaca, a place where everyone was happy ... maybe for some it was, a mythical place, but it remained in 2006, the year where everything was possible . Today
from the events of February 15, 2011, which resulted a standoff of several hours between the police and the "people" of Oaxaca, derived this from an act of repression by the federal police against a demonstration of teachers under section 22 against the visit of spurious Felipe Calderón, the picture of today is simply devastating, and I rinse before quoting anything from people, this mainly because it seems that many of them were members of the movement in 2006, but many today who did not participate that Tuesday and have participated in 2006, made the criticism of people who entered this contest, so just the whole town was gone, that does not diminish the actions of those who were present, instead, exalts, remembering something that said the dean of Egypt, which are held in the streets protesting are not wrong, are what give rise to this follow.
And much criticism from received by different sectors is important to clarify several things to say about what happened, first of all would be the difference between Egypt and Oaxaca, but that the revolt would like to see that day led to a great movement as happens and not only in Egypt but in much of the Arab world, but was simply a clash of hours between police and people who want to change this but has not been supported either by the same section 22, agreements assembly were just warm, and most laughable Gabino immediate response which said it would remove the 4 officials who asked, he'd better bone mothers, this for all the naive who thought Gabino would change, because there's your change, the answers were known long before things were raised, simply deaf ear to the worker (now) Calderon, who only make the case to this (but I believe that's the lame speech boots as in La Salle).
The other point that too many critics is the alleged destruction caused in the historic center of Oaxaca, who as a totally tourist center has to be in the best conditions, this response would simply be too simple, the architecture of places representing what is society, in Oaxaca is this story that reflects resistance, struggle, fighting inequality, fed up, etc. The repression the people are seeking forms of defense and found the stones taken out of the buildings in this city and many "works" if they forget they were made during the period of so hated Ulises Ruiz, and they were filled protests by the majority of society, remember that the damage to the architecture of Oaxaca was so great that almost lost its essence the center, and what about the night club are doing at this point in the hill fort, that is outrageous. About
tourism, and how to frighten him, nothing better than war and its 34 thousand killed by the state (to scare not only Oaxaca but throughout Mexico), in the end Oaxacan society decide whether you get along with tourism or want improvements in lifestyles that are just plain bad, and these forms will get to fight.
on the violent actions that allegedly show the TV stations (mainly where the police beat), we should not seek a justification for the acts of people who participated in the fighting, but it is clear to point out that social discontent is much, people in this violent society also reflects the violence, mainly by adding to the glut of young people who have seen or been in the worst victims of the police apparatus, see in this any way to directly confront the bullies of freedom youth in this case do not forget, this way of picking the police if one is the one that falls are what many do so, so you have to look at these outbreaks of violence from another perspective and not from a sensationalist tendensioso by of television, which certainly did not spend the abuses that were raised by the police about a woman facing the cathedral, where a policeman kicks the lady simply to record (the daily news has an image of that fact). About
promised by law enforcement Gabino on the facts "violent" by pseudoactivistas, vandals and people infiltrated the Pri, be careful, this simple fact is another example of the repression of social protest, the real culprits are those that implement a repressor of the various freedoms that supposedly one account.
would therefore be good to give an overview of the history of some years ago, that history did a people when they forget prejudices about the various sectors of society to advance in all other ways of living, not to fall into disrepair, into oblivion experienced events that would condemn us to relive what it means in practice we had passed, and the worst thing should never take away from those crazy dreamers dreams of change, the better contágiense of that way of life, remember above all that is his people that is being repressed, listen to each other, critics will always come but we break with that, that they will say, break with the fear system, remember that in the struggle are their children, their families, their students, we are all of different thoughts, because they simply do not want to be what they want us to be, we will continue on the streets, fighting until we achieve what we as people want, and where that Oaxaca and that world does not stay in historical dates but can live in it, because that Oaxaca was not, now shows that it is there, we follow here. APPOSTOL
0 comments:
Post a Comment